![]() ![]() Harbal also has some 'automatic' eq profiling functions but I wouldn't use that either - but it does have the very useful function of letting you see peak, mean and average response curves across the mix which is beneficial in getting the best frequency balance. You may even, on some mixes, want to automate the parameters of those processes during the mix rather than just stick to what a computer is suggesting it thinks will work or should sound good for the whole track. Like AAMS it does do other tasks other than just frequency response - but most would rather leave compression/limiting to their chosen 'high end' tools rather than a one stop solution. ![]() Also AAMS installs a Reference Database of 200 Musical styles. ![]() Featuring 100 Band Equalizer, 8 Multiband Compression, Balancing and Loudness settings for internal DSP Processing with all audio corrections automaticly done purely inside the AAMS Program. The reason I like Harbal is because it's pretty task specific. AAMS Auto Audio Mastering System v3.9.0.1 Full version. Any 'automatic' mastering process is merely a poor substitute for experienced ears and specific tools - a good real world comparison would be paying money to have a track mastered using two different methods:Ī) pay cheapo for an 'unattended cut' where the whole thing gets banged through a TC Finaliser presetī) pay mucho for attended cut where you can tweak each song to the nth degree with the best equipment available AAMS sets out to cover all the bases whereas Harbal is more of an EQ tool with a basic limiter/stereo spread function added on. Maybe 'better' is a bit unfair Mazzo - specific might be a better term. Mazzo wrote:what makes har-bal better than AAMS? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |